HALF A MILLION DOWNLOADS REACHED - Helping Safeguard children from psychiatric drug harm due to possible severe toxic side effects. We need alternatives like psychological interventions, physical activity, or mindfulness training as a first course of action. Let's 'Enable not Label' kids to give them better futures - - - - - - - - -"There can be no keener examination of a society's soul than the way it chooses to treat its children." - - - - -
- Nelson Mandela
Just as many authors of the new
psychiatry "bible" are tied to the drugs industry as those who worked on
the previous version, a study has found, despite new transparency
The findings raise concerns over the independence of the revamped Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM, published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and scheduled for publication in May 2013.
For the current rewrite, known as DSM-5,
the APA for the first time required authors to declare their financial
ties to industry. It also limited the amount they could receive from
drug companies to $10,000 a year and their stock holdings to $50,000.
"Transparency alone can't mitigate bias," says Lisa Cosgrove of Harvard University, who along with Sheldon Krimsky
of Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts, analysed the financial
disclosures of 141 members of the "work groups" drafting the manual.
They found that just as many contributors – 57 per cent – had links to
industry as were found in a previous study of the authors of DSM-IV and an interim revision, published in 1994 and 2000 respectively.
Cosgrove also points out that the
$10,000-per-year limit on payments excludes research grants. "Nothing
has really changed," she says.
What's more, the work groups that had
the most members with ties to the pharmaceutical industry were
considering illnesses for which drugs are the front-line treatment – and
for which proposed changes to diagnostic categories are especially
Critics claim that definitions of
psychiatric illnesses have broadened over successive editions of the
manual as a result of pressure from the pharmaceutical industry. A steep
rise in the number of children given psychoactive drugs for bipolar disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder has been particularly controversial.
Cosgrove is especially concerned about DSM
authors who serve on "speakers' bureaus" – experts who are paid to
lecture about a drug company's products. These payments are not
specifically identified in the DSM-5 disclosures, but web searches indicated that 15 per cent of the work group members were speakers' bureau members.
Cosgrove wants the APA to remove authors who are on speakers' bureaus before DSM-5
is finalised. She also wants the membership of work groups to be
changed so that none has a majority of members with financial ties to
James Scully, medical director of the
APA, insists the association is "committed to evaluating and monitoring
the issue of financial conflicts of interest". He says the study "does
not take into account the efforts by DSM-5 task force and work
group members to divest themselves from relationships with the
pharmaceutical industry". The web searches for speakers' bureau
memberships go back to 2006, while the work groups were appointed
between July 2007 and May 2008.
The DSM-5 proposals have also
attracted criticism from psychologists, who tend to favour counselling
over the drug treatments that dominate modern psychiatry. An online petition
calling for greater involvement from psychologists has attracted more
than 12,000 signatures, and is backed by professional bodies including
14 out of the 54 divisions of the American Psychological Association.
David Elkins, president of the Society for Humanistic Psychology,
which wrote the open letter on which the petition is based, complains
that psychiatrists have undue influence on how mental illness is
"A small group with only 38,000
members has been for years responsible for telling the rest of the
profession, consisting of hundreds of thousands of people, how to think
about mental disorders," says Elkins. "I think we tapped into a
groundswell of mental health professionals who are not going to tolerate
In January, the psychologists behind the open letter wrote to the APA asking for an independent scientific review of diagnostic changes planned for DSM-5.
The APA has rejected this call: "There is, in fact, no outside organisation that has the capacity to replicate the range of expertise that DSM-5 has assembled over the past decade to review diagnostic criteria," replied APA president John Oldham.