A PSYCHOLOGICAL FORMULATION OF MENTAL DISTRESS - THE HPP MODEL COMMENTARY - (TRAXSON, PARKER, ROWLAND AND MATTHEWS 2011)-------"What we need as professionals is a naturalistic narrative of needs NOT a dysfunctional discussion of dubiously diagnosed disorders." - A menu of alternatives to medication is proposed to trigger creative thinking about the options available to deal with behavioural difficulties.THE HPP MODEL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND WELLBEING FOR YOUNG PEOPLE FEATURES OF THE HPP MODEL - A multi-dimensional discursive appro...
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - Medications and their Dangerous Side-Effects. Description: An in-depth report on the causes, ...
DSM5, PSYCHIATRY and MEDICAL ETHICS : Is using psychotropics for normal behavioural patterns in kids + social control unethical! The Stanford University 4 key principles are clearly breached in the U.S. and the U.K.for children on psychotropic drugs - unethical practice is the 'trump card' in the campaign against the influence of DSM5 and the safeguarding of our children in the U.K.and the U.S. - Let's deal our children a better hand!-Map of U.S. showing skewed prescription rate for ADHD - (low prescription use in west, with the sun and surf outlets, and higher across ...
Why No One Is Satisfied With Psychiatric Diagnoses Main Category: Psychology / Psychiatry The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Me...
THE MENTAL HEALTH DEBATE = A GREAT ARTICLE - "At War With Ourselves"- By Rufus May, a Psychologist from Bradford U.K. - Courtesy of Mad in America WebsiteAt War With Ourselves Rufus May September 15, 2013 If we call someone mentally ill, in some ways we may b...
Many authors of psychiatry bible have industry ties 21:00 13 March 2012 by ...
DR ALLEN FRANCES (LEAD EDITOR OF THE DSM4 PANEL) - COINS THE TERM - 'FALSE EPIDEMICS OF CHILDHOOD DISORDERS' DUE TO DSM4.DR ALLAN FRANCES ADMITS: " WE MADE MISTAKES WITH DSM4 WHICH HAVE HAD TERRIBLE CONSEQUENCES FOR CHILDREN.&quo...
DSM-5 Professor Allen Frances : Internet Addiction - The Next New Fad Diagnosis Let's stop it before it starts - Courtesy of the Psychology Today WebsiteInternet Addiction - The Next New Fad Diagnosis Let's stop it before it starts Publishe...
Total Downloads Worldwide
Thursday, 31 May 2012
DSM5 - The American Psychiatric Association’s proposal for ADHD – Making lifelong patients of even more healthy people - COURTESY OF SPEEDUPSITSTILL.COM - WEBSITE
The American Psychiatric Association’s DSM5 proposal for ADHD – Making lifelong patients of even more healthy people
July 25, 2011 by martin whitely
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has published its draft changes for the fifth edition of its internationally influential Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM5), due for final release in May 2013. Along with other worrying changes the APA seems determined to further loosen its already absurdly broad diagnostic criteria for ADHD.
Four more ways to display ADHD
The most obvious of the changes is the inclusion of four extra ways of exhibiting ADHD. For a diagnosis of the primarily hyperactive subtype instead of children having to display 6 of 9 (67%) impulsive/hyperactive diagnostic criteria, 6 of 13 (47%) would be sufficient. The four additional criteria are;
1- Tends to act without thinking, such as starting tasks without adequate preparation or avoiding reading or listening to instructions. May speak out without considering consequences or make important decisions on the spur of the moment, such as impulsively buying items, suddenly quitting a job, or breaking up with a friend.
2- Is often impatient, as shown by feeling restless when waiting for others and wanting to move faster than others, wanting people to get to the point, speeding while driving, and cutting into traffic to go faster than others.
3- Is uncomfortable doing things slowly and systematically and often rushes through activities or tasks.
4- Finds it difficult to resist temptations or opportunities, even if it means taking risks (A child may grab toys off a store shelf or play with dangerous objects; adults may commit to a relationship after only a brief acquaintance or take a job or enter into a business arrangement without doing due diligence).1
(The full list of the proposed DSM5 behavioural criteria are listed at the end of this blog or from http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevision/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=383)
All of the new DSM5 criteria are normal human behaviours. I for one never read instructions, am often impatient, frequently give into temptation, sometimes speed (and occasionally get angry with those who don’t and sit in the passing lane). I do these things because like the other 7 billion odd people on the planet I am far from perfect.
To anyone with a modicum of common sense or empathy the absurdity of these extra diagnostic criteria is self-evident. Although in fairness they are no more ridiculous than the current DSMIV criteria which include disliking homework and chores, losing toys, not listening, fidgeting, butting in, talking excessively or being easily distracted or forgetful.
In my experience the two most common reactions when people read the current DSMIV criteria for the first time is to say either “that’s me” or “that’s everybody”. (More detail about DSMIV is available at http://speedupsitstill.com/dodgy-diagnosis ) Arguably the changes proposed for DSM5 will make it harder not to meet the diagnostic criteria than to meet them.
Setting the bar even lower for Adult ADHD
For anyone 17 or older the ADHD bar will be lowered even further. It will be sufficient to meet as little as 4 (down from 6) of either the 9 inattentive or 4 of the expanded 13 impulsive/hyperactive criteria.2 These changes continue the long term trend of lowering the bar for a diagnosis of ADHD. DSMIII required six of nine inattentive behaviours and six of nine impulsive/hyperactive behaviours. The bar was lowered significantly in DSM-IV when reduced to six of nine inattentive or six of nine hyperactive/impulsive behaviours.3 DSM5 lowers it even further. Effectively an adult was required to display at least 12 of 18 (67%) behaviours in DSMIII, however for DSM-5 it proposed that as few as 4 of 22 (17%) will qualify for a diagnosis.
Other subtle but nonetheless significant changes include:
1- The relaxation of the DSMIV expectation that teachers independently provide evidence.4
2- Replacing hyperactive actions in the wording of criteria to feelings or perceptions of ‘restlessness’.5
3- The medicalisation, of the normal phenomena that ADHD behaviours are ‘typically more marked during times when the person is studying or working’ than ‘during vacation’. 6
4- The inclusion of adult relevant examples in most of the diagnostic criteria which had previously been primarily orientated to children in a school setting. 7
5- The change in the requirement that signs of the behaviour should be displayed before age seven to age twelve.8
$ The Bottom Line $
All the DSM5 proposed changes if implemented are likely to increase ADHD patient numbers and pharmaceutical company profits. Too often regulators like the FDA and TGA treat big pharmaceutical companies as if them as if they are benevolent enterprises. In reality they are morally neutral profit maximisers, superb marketers and completely indifferent as to whether their products help or harm humanity. They know how to promote ’experts’ who, however well intentioned, advocate their products and they thrive in the current largely self-regulated environment.9 It is time for policy makers to understand how much it is economics rather than science that is behind the explosion in ADHD prescribing.
The history of ADHD is a classic example of how to create and then expand a previously non-existent market. It was initially sold as a boy’s disorder requiring both hyperactivity and inattention. Then passive ADD (without the H for Hyperactivity) was marketed as a gender equity issue with the argument that ‘quiet girls’ were believed to be missing out as their ‘disability’ was ‘under-recognised’.10 The changes proposed for DSM5 will protect and enhance the child market and create continuity of the pharmaceutical company’s customer base into adulthood and likely replicate the massive explosion in psychotropic drug prescribing rates that occurred when DSMIV replaced DSMIII in 1994.11
With the benefit of hindsight, Dr Allen Frances, who was the chief of psychiatry at the Duke University Medical Centre and led the effort to update DSM-IV, regretted broadening the diagnostic criteria and warned of problems with the drafting of the next edition, DSM-V, due for final release in 2012. Frances believes: ‘We learned some very, very, painful lessons in doing DSM IV…we thought we were being really careful about everything we did and we wanted to discourage changes. But inadvertently, I think we helped to trigger three false epidemics. One for Autistic Disorder…another for the childhood diagnosis of Bi-Polar Disorder and the third for the wild over-diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder.’ 12
Whilst it is heartening that Dr Frances has learned the lessons of DSMIV it is clear from the draft of DSM5 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) have not. Given the APA’s long history of close ties to Big Pharma13 and recent revelations about undisclosed drug company payments to the world’s most frequently cited ‘ADHD expert’ Harvard Professor Joseph Biederman, it is easy to assume the ‘experts’ guiding the DSM5 changes are motivated by money. (see http://speedupsitstill.com/world-leading-adhd-%e2%80%98expert%e2%80%99-harvard-professor-joseph-biederman-sanctioned-hidden-drug-company-money-allegations )
However, the APA have made some effort recently to restrict their reliance on pharmaceutical company funding and I believe most ADHD enthusiasts are not corrupt. Rather they are fervent believers in the ‘disorder’ and it’s hypothesised ‘biological roots’. It is likely money is not the primary motivation of those developing the DSM5 criteria for ADHD. Instead they are probably suffering from the one ‘disorder’ that is both very common and destructive but yet to be officially recognised, CSDD (Common Sense Deficit Disorder).
Either way being disorganised impatient, inattentive, impulsive, or failing to resist temptation isn’t disease, its humanity. And giving children amphetamines for basically being immature, annoying, inconvenient or embarrassing isn’t a medical treatment, its child abuse. Too many young Australians have suffered from our country’s blind acceptance of the American Psychiatric Association’s approach to mental health. This doesn’t just apply to ADHD. As I will outline in coming blogs the APA’s DSM5 proposals for other disorders are just as troubling.
The Australian response to DSM5 must be unequivocal. It is time to go it alone and abandon our slavish devotion to the American Psychiatric Association’s model because although DSMIV contained more than its fair share of crap, DSM5 smells far worse.
Appendix – The American Psychiatric Associations proposed new DSM5 diagnostic criteria fo ADHD are listed below.
A. Either (1) and/or (2).
1. Inattention: Six (or more) of the following symptoms have persisted for at least 6 months to a degree that is inconsistent with developmental level and that impact directly on social and academic/occupational activities. Note: for older adolescents and adults (ages 17 and older), only 4 symptoms are required. The symptoms are not due to oppositional behavior, defiance, hostility, or a failure to understand tasks or instructions.
(a) Often fails to give close attention to details or makes careless mistakes in schoolwork, at work, or during other activities (for example, overlooks or misses details, work is inaccurate).
(b) Often has difficulty sustaining attention in tasks or play activities (for example, has difficulty remaining focused during lectures, conversations, or reading lengthy writings).
(c) Often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly (mind seems elsewhere, even in the absence of any obvious distraction).
(d) Frequently does not follow through on instructions (starts tasks but quickly loses focus and is easily sidetracked, fails to finish schoolwork, household chores, or tasks in the workplace).
(e) Often has difficulty organizing tasks and activities. (Has difficulty managing sequential tasks and keeping materials and belongings in order. Work is messy and disorganized. Has poor time management and tends to fail to meet deadlines.)
(f) Characteristically avoids, seems to dislike, and is reluctant to engage in tasks that require sustained mental effort (such as schoolwork or homework or, for older adolescents and adults, preparing reports, completing forms, or reviewing lengthy papers).
(g) Frequently loses objects necessary for tasks or activities (e.g., school assignments, pencils, books, tools, wallets, keys, paperwork, eyeglasses, or mobile telephones).
(h) Is often easily distracted by extraneous stimuli. (for older adolescents and adults may include unrelated thoughts.).
(i) Is often forgetful in daily activities, chores, and running errands (for older adolescents and adults, returning calls, paying bills, and keeping appointments).
2. Hyperactivity and Impulsivity: Six (or more) of the following symptoms have persisted for at least 6 months to a degree that is inconsistent with developmental level and that impact directly on social and academic/occupational activities. Note: for older adolescents and adults (ages 17 and older), only 4 symptoms are required. The symptoms are not due to oppositional behavior, defiance, hostility, or a failure to understand tasks or instructions.
(a) Often fidgets or taps hands or feet or squirms in seat.
(b) Is often restless during activities when others are seated (may leave his or her place in the classroom, office or other workplace, or in other situations that require remaining seated).
(c) Often runs about or climbs on furniture and moves excessively in inappropriate situations. In adolescents or adults, may be limited to feeling restless or confined.
(d) Is often excessively loud or noisy during play, leisure, or social activities.
(e) Is often “on the go,” acting as if “driven by a motor.” Is uncomfortable being still for an extended time, as in restaurants, meetings, etc. Seen by others as being restless and difficult to keep up with.
(f) Often talks excessively.
(g) Often blurts out an answer before a question has been completed. Older adolescents or adults may complete people’s sentences and “jump the gun” in conversations.
(h) Has difficulty waiting his or her turn or waiting in line.
(i) Often interrupts or intrudes on others (frequently butts into conversations, games, or activities; may start using other people’s things without asking or receiving permission, adolescents or adults may intrude into or take over what others are doing).
(j) Tends to act without thinking, such as starting tasks without adequate preparation or avoiding reading or listening to instructions. May speak out without considering consequences or make important decisions on the spur of the moment, such as impulsively buying items, suddenly quitting a job, or breaking up with a friend.
(k) Is often impatient, as shown by feeling restless when waiting for others and wanting to move faster than others, wanting people to get to the point, speeding while driving, and cutting into traffic to go faster than others.
(l) Is uncomfortable doing things slowly and systematically and often rushes through activities or tasks.
(m) Finds it difficult to resist temptations or opportunities, even if it means taking risks (A child may grab toys off a store shelf or play with dangerous objects; adults may commit to a relationship after only a brief acquaintance or take a job or enter into a business arrangement without doing due diligence).