'Grief
and anxiety are not mental illnesses'
By Peter Kinderman Professor of Clinical Psychology
Everyday
anxieties could become targets for medical treatment in an updated US
psychiatric manual DSM-5
The
forthcoming edition of an American psychiatric manual will increase the number
of people in the general population diagnosed with a mental illness - but what
they need is help and understanding, not labels and medication.
Many
people experience a profound and long-lasting grieving process following the
death of a loved one. Many soldiers returning from conflict suffer from trauma.
Many of us are shy and anxious in social situations or unmotivated and
pessimistic if we're unemployed or dislike our jobs.
For
a few of us, our experiences of abuse or failure lead us to feel that life is
not worth living. We need to recognise these human truths and we need to offer
help. But we should not regard these human experiences as symptoms of a mental
illness.
Psychiatric
diagnoses are not only scientifically invalid, they are harmful too. The
language of illness implies that the roots of such emotional distress lie in
abnormalities in our brain and biology, usually known as "chemical
imbalances".
This
leads us to be blind to the social and psychological causes of distress.
More
importantly, we tend to prescribe medical solutions - anti-depressants and
anti-psychotic medication - despite significant side-effects and poor evidence
of their effectiveness.
“The
criteria for "generalised anxiety disorder" would be significantly
relaxed, making the worries of everyday life into targets for medical treatment.”
Prof Peter Kinderman
"This
is wrong. We should not be diagnosing many more people with meaningless
"mental illnesses", telling them these stem from brain abnormalities,
and prescribing medication."
Sex addiction
An
extremely influential American psychiatric manual used by clinicians and
researchers to diagnose and classify mental disorders has been updated for
publication in May 2013.
But
this latest edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual, or DSM-5, will only make a bad situation worse
because it will lower many diagnostic thresholds and increase the number of
people in the general population seen as having a mental illness.
- The new diagnosis of "disruptive mood dysregulation disorder" will turn childhood temper tantrums into symptoms of a mental illness
- Normal grief will become "major depressive disorder", meaning people will turn to diagnosis and prescription as a response to bereavement
- The criteria for "generalised anxiety disorder" will be significantly relaxed, making the worries of everyday life into targets for medical treatment
- Lower diagnostic thresholds will see more diagnoses of "adult attention deficit disorder", which could lead to widespread prescription of stimulant drugs
- A wide range of unfortunate human behaviours, the subject of many new year's resolutions, will become mental illnesses - excessive eating will become "binge eating disorder", and the category of "behavioural addictions" will widen significantly to include such "disorders" as "internet addiction" and "sex addiction"
Stigma of diagnosis
Standard
psychiatric diagnoses are notoriously invalid - they do not correspond to
meaningful clusters of symptoms in the real world, despite the obvious
importance that they should. Diagnoses fail to predict the effectiveness of
particular treatments and they do not map neatly onto biological processes.
In
current mental-health systems, diagnosis is often seen as necessary for
accessing services. However, it also sets the scene for the misuse and overuse
of medical interventions such as anti-psychotic and anti-depressant drugs,
which have worrying long-term side-effects.
Scientific
evidence strongly suggests distressing experiences result not from "faulty
brains", but from complex interactions between biological, but more
importantly, social and psychological factors.
But
diagnosis and the language of biological illness obscure the causal role of
factors such as abuse, poverty and social deprivation. The result is often
further stigma, discrimination and social exclusion.
Therapeutic approach
There
are humane and effective alternatives to traditional psychiatric diagnoses.
It
is relatively straightforward to generate a simple list of problems that can be
reliably and validly defined. There is no reason to assume that these phenomena
cluster into diagnostic categories or are the consequences of underlying
illnesses.
We
can then use medical and psychological science to understand how problems might
have originated, and recommend therapeutic solutions.
This
approach would yield all the benefits of the current diagnosis-and-treatment
approach without its many inadequacies and dangers.
Prof
Peter Kinderman is head of the Institute of Psychology, Health and Society at
the University of Liverpool.
No comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE ADD COMMENTS SO I CAN IMPROVE THE INFORMATION I AM SHARING ON THIS VERY IMPORTANT TOPIC.