(CNN) -- To ease the heartache of her first child's stillbirth, Kelli Montgomery chose rigorous exercise, yoga and meditation over the antidepressants and sleeping pills that her physicians immediately suggested.
"'You need to be on this
medication or that medication.' It was shocking to me that that was the
first line of defense," said Montgomery, 42, director of the MISS
Foundation for Grieving Families in Austin, Texas. "From the time I was
in the hospital to when I was seeing my general practitioner, that's
what they were insisting on."
Her choice stemmed partly
from a longtime aversion to taking prescription drugs. It was also the
result of listening to a growing group of psychiatrists, psychologists
and clinical social workers from around the world who argue that
depression and other normal responses to life's toughest challenges are
too often labeled as disorders -- and as such, demand medicine with
sometimes dangerous side effects.
Protesters such as
Montgomery contend diagnoses of serious psychological and psychiatric
disorders have also needlessly skyrocketed alongside the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' expanding list of what
constitutes mental illness.
The manual is considered the bible of psychiatry because it's the
criteria mental health professionals use to diagnose patients.
One example of the issue
is the frequency of bipolar disorder in children. It has jumped 40-fold
in the last two decades, said Dr. Bernard Carroll, a former Duke
University psychiatry department chairman.
Kelli Montgomery chose rigorous exercise, yoga and meditation after her first child's stillbirth.
"You've got all these
young kids running around with this diagnosis, yet many of them have
never, ever had a manic episode, which is the hallmark of bipolar
disorder," said Carroll, now the scientific director of the Pacific
Behavioral Research Foundation.
"Many of these kids," he
continued, "have never had anything other than irritability. Yet they're
exposed to anti-convulsants, anti-psychotic drugs, which have serious
long-term side effects in the form of obesity, metabolic syndrome,
diabetes and some movement disorders ... that can leave a person
extremely disfigured physically."
The International DSM-5
Response Committee -- named after the upcoming fifth incarnation of that
diagnostic manual -- plans to launch a campaign next month aimed at
blocking the manual's May 20 release. Short of that, critics plan to
press ahead with their case that the DSM-5 should be viewed with some
skepticism and not wholly embraced by practitioners or patients.
"We believe that there
is now overwhelming evidence that DSM-5 is scientifically unsound (and)
statistically unreliable," said clinical psychologist Peter Kinderman,
director of the University of Liverpool's Institute of Psychology,
Health and Society. He is helping organize the international campaign
with petition drives in the United States, the United Kingdom and
France.
Liza Long: 'My son wants to be well'
The American Psychiatric
Association, whose manual has been used by health insurers,
pharmaceutical companies, doctors and other clinicians since it first
published in 1952, has dismissed DSM-5 opponents as overly alarmed.
"All the good
epidemiological studies unfortunately show that one in five people have a
psychological disorder. ... They're prevalent, they're just all over
the place, and that's very disturbing to some people," said Dr. Carl
Bell, a Chicago psychiatrist and University of Illinois School of
Medicine director of public health and community psychiatry.
One of 15 members of a
DSM-5 committee zeroing in on personality disorders, Bell spoke on
behalf of the psychiatric association. "If you dig down into (the
DSM-5), it's an extraordinarily complex document."
However, critics
contend, the manual's shortcomings include its lack of scientifically
conclusive field testing of some of its recommendations; its failure to
consider the prior effectiveness or ineffectiveness of anti-psychotic
drugs to determine a patient's present diagnosis; and its lumping of,
for example, what had been a spectrum of depressions -- from the mildly
melancholic to the severely debilitating -- into one group.
"This is the reason that
people nowadays are jumping up and saying, 'The antidepressant drugs
don't work,'" Carroll said. "If you take this broad category, it's
difficult to even show why they don't work."
"There's a great deal of
a concern, so we are hardly voices in the wilderness," said Dr. Allen
Frances, author of the book "Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against
Out of Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma and the
Medicalization of Ordinary Life." He is largely credited with
spearheading anti-DMS-5 efforts.
"A petition regarding
DSM-5, signed by 50-plus associations, was presented to the (psychiatric
association), asking for an independent scientific review. The
association brushed it aside," said Frances, a Duke professor emeritus
and former psychiatric department chairman.
The psychiatric
association says the DSM-5 was independently reviewed for 18 months but
that those findings will not be made public. Also, the reviewers'
identities will not be disclosed until the manual is released.
"The development of
DSM-5 began with an unprecedented process of research evaluation that
included a series of white papers and 13 scientific conferences
supported by the National Institutes of Health," wrote Dr. David Kupfer,
chairman of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, who
oversees the entire DSM-5 task force, in an e-mail.
"This preparation
brought together more than 400 international scientists and produced a
series of monographs and peer-reviewed journal articles. DSM-5 is the
product of the most extensive discussion and debate -- as part of the
most transparent process -- of any DSM."
Frances contends that
the process, though conducted with volunteers, has been somewhat
secretive and did not sufficiently consider objections to what the
manual will contain.
Frances led the task
force that produced the DSM IV in 2000. "What motivates me is the
experience of having inadvertently contributed to fads and
psycho-diagnosis that have resulted in over-diagnosis and
over-treatment," Frances said. "Some of this happened during DSM IV,
even though we were more conservative with that document than they've
been with DSM-5, with its many changes that are unsupported and, in some
cases, quite reckless."
For example, Frances
said DSM-5 would mislabel one in four people with chronic pain and
irritable bowel syndrome with the DSM-5's newly created "somatic symptom
disorder," which is diagnosed when a person has spent at least six
months steadily thinking of and being anxious about their medical
illness.
According to Frances and
other like-minded critics, a confluence of related factors resulted in
an "over-medicalizing" and over-diagnosis of mental illness. Chief among
them, they contend, is that an increasing number of primary care and
other nonpsychiatric doctors are dispensing anti-psychotic drugs,
despite their lack of training in that area of medicine. Aggressive
sales and marketing by pharmaceutical companies may also be driving the
surge.
Those factors, Montgomery said, were likely part of what was at play after her baby's stillbirth.
"I had no mental
illness. I had never been medicated. I had not even suggested that I was
depressed," she said. "And I kept asking if anyone merely knew a
therapist that I could go talk to about what was clearly a traumatic
experience."
While Montgomery didn't
require prescription medications, even DSM-5 protesters acknowledge that
there are people whose disorders demand such intensive intervention,
perhaps throughout their lifetime.
Still, critics say the upcoming manual veers in the wrong direction.
"The DSM-5, in many
ways, reflects the politics of psychiatry these days," said Dr. Joel
Paris, author of "Prescriptions for the Mind: A Critical View of
Contemporary Psychiatry," a psychiatry professor at McGill University
and researcher at Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital in Montreal,
Quebec.
"Everybody has a kind of
investment in certain diagnoses. Those who are studying a particular
disorder often are saying, 'Well, this is much more common than you
think they are. Oh, the prevalence is very high.' But we risk losing
legitimacy because of over-diagnosis. ... The fact is that most people
get by with bad patches in their lives. They recover."
No comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE ADD COMMENTS SO I CAN IMPROVE THE INFORMATION I AM SHARING ON THIS VERY IMPORTANT TOPIC.